Skip Navigation

Graduate Program Assessment Evidence

The Educational Leadership Program at Oakland City University follows the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) Standards, which fall under the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA).

Standard 1.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a school or district vision of learning supported by the school community.

Standard 2.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by promoting a positive school culture, providing an effective instructional program, applying best practice to student learning, and designing comprehensive professional growth plans for staff.

Standard 3.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by managing the organization, operations, and resources in a way that promotes a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.

Standard 4.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by collaborating with families and other community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources.

Standard 5.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by acting with integrity, fairly, and in an ethical manner.

Standard 6.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by understanding, responding to, and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.

Standard 7.0: Internship. The internship provides significant opportunities for candidates to synthesize and apply the knowledge and practice and develop the skills identified in Standards 1-6 through substantial, sustained, standards-based work in real settings, planned and guided cooperatively by the institution and school district personnel for graduate credit. 

Doctorate in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.) Program

*The small differences present among scores for each evaluator suggests strong inter-rater reliability.

Ed.D. Program Data Analysis

Portfolio Evaluations

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2012

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2011

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2010

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2009

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2008

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2007

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2006

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2005

Portfolio Evaluation Statistics 2004

Preliminary Examination

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2012

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2011

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2010

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2009

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2008

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2007

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2006

Preliminary Exam Statistics 2005

Dissertation Defense Evaluations

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2012

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2011

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2010

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2009

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2008

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2007

Dissertation Defense Statistics 2006

Master of Arts in Teaching (M.A.T.) Program

M.A.T. Response to Data Results on Portfolios

Portfolio Evaluations

Option I - Portfolio Evaluation 2009 to 2010

Option I - Portfolio Evaluation 2008 to 2009 Elementary Education

Option I - Portfolio Evaluation 2008 to 2009 Secondary Education

Option I - Portfolio Evaluation 2008 to 2009 Special Education

Option I - Portfolio Evaluation 2007 to 2008

Option II - Portfolio Evaluation 2009 to 2010

Option II - Portfolio Evaluation 2008 to 2009

Option II - Portfolio Evaluation 2007 to 2008

Option III - Portfolio Evaluation 2009 to 2010

Option III - Portfolio Evaluation 2008 to 2009

Option III - Portfolio Evaluation 2007 to 2008

Action Research Paper Evaluations

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Elementary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Secondary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Special Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Elementary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Secondary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Special Education Evaluation

Option I - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Option II - 2009 to 2010 Evaluation

Option II - 2008 to 2009 Evaluation

Option II - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Option III - 2009 to 2010 Evaluation

Option III - 2008 to 2009 Evaluation

Option III - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Research Presentation Evaluations

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Elementary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Secondary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2009 to 2010 Special Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Elementary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Secondary Education Evaluation

Option I - 2008 to 2009 Special Education Evaluation

Option I - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Option II - 2009 to 2010 Evaluation

Option II - 2008 to 2009 Evaluation

Option II - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Option III - 2009 to 2010 Evaluation

Option III - 2008 to 2009 Evaluation

Option III - 2007 to 2008 Evaluation

Forms  |  Site Map  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy